|
||||
| PI ONLINE: 9-26-03 | ||||
| The
Recording Industry Association of America Versus This Kid BY BEN WINTERS For
many newspapers, Brianna LaHara was too good to be true. What better way
to get readers inside an important but complicated story, namely the lawsuit
launched on Sept. 8 by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA),
against 261 average internet music users around the country?
LaHara
is a 12-year old girl who lives in Manhattans Upper West Side; and, though
it might be tough to explain a rash of lawsuits and the technology behind
them, it was certainly easy to explain how it feels for a pre-teen to
be sued by the recording industry. It feels bad. Brianna
LaHara said she was frightened to learn she was among the hundreds of
people sued yesterday by giant music companies in federal courts around
the country, summarized the New York Post on Sept. 9, before quoting poor,
shaken LaHara: I thought it was OK to download music because my mom paid
a service fee for it. Out of all people, why did they pick me? Yeah,
why her? She is, the Post reported, an honors student who, when found
by the paper was helping her brother with his homework. Of course, the
point of the lawsuits, at least in part, is to show that regular peopleeven
regular, overachieving 12-year old girlsare committing a crime when they
download music off the Internet. The
LA Times took a similar tack as the New York Post in reporting the music
industry suit, using as their test case the Bassett family of Redwood
City, Calif. Speaking to the Times, Mr. Bassett sounded downright baffled
by the trouble his family was in. He and his wife dont download music,
apparently, but their teenagers and dozens of their friends do. Had he
known what was going on, [Bassett] said, I would have pulled the plug.
Can
I just call them up and say Im sorry and give them back all the music
that was downloaded? says Mr. Bassett to the Times, displaying a startling
level of technical incomprehension or a sly pretense of idiocy. Im just
a little guy. USA
Todays report on the RIAA lawsuits (many of which were settled within
24 hours, including young Briannas) including some notes on the record
industrys other big tactic to save itself: slashing CD prices. Last
year, music shipments fell to $12.6 billion. Record sales so far this
year have dropped 8.6 percent, says Americas paper. Desperate times call
for desperate measures. Desperate
indeed: The worlds biggest music company, Universal Music, announced last
week that it will drop list prices for CDs starting Oct. 7 to help kick-start
sales. Virtually all top-line CDs for artists such as Eminem, [Mary J.]
Blige, 50 Cent and Shania Twain will list for $12.98, down 25 percent
or more from the current $16.98-$18.98. Selling prices could drop as low
as $9.98. Theres
nothing like wholesale assault on an industry to bring prices down to
somewhere approaching the reasonable. Dreaming
of a New Chicago A
company with the cheerful and optimistic name of TheatreDreams put in
its bid for a portion of Chicagos theatrical future (and history), as
reported by City Hall reporter Fran Spielman in the Sun-Times.
The
storied Chicago Theatre would be transformed into a center for the performing
arts active 200 nights a year, including a family-oriented Christmas spectacular,
under a $3 million deal advanced Tuesday [Sept. 9], writes Spielman. City-funded
improvements are underway; the goal is to get the theatre up and running
by 2008. Spielman notes that TheatreDreams is run by a fella who used
to be president of the Kennedy Center and
speaking of that historic institution, the General Accounting Office (GAO,
an arm of the Federal Government charged with keeping all the other arms
from throwing our money down the toilet) had some questions recently for
the Kennedy Center, as reported in the Washington Post on Sept. 11. A
new GAO report, focused on the centers construction of new parking and
exterior areas, said what originally appeared to be a $28 million job
wound up costing about $60 million more and created only about half as
many new parking spaces as estimated. The GAO said the poor management
raised questions about how officials will handle the massive additions
planned for the center over the next 10 years. Anyone
who has tried to go see anything at the Kennedy Center in the last year
or so, and wound their way through a maze of scaffolding and dust, might
be wondering the same thing. Indian
Givers and Takers Prepare
yourself for one of the great feature article lead paragraphs. Its from
the Denver Post, dateline Sept. 2, byline Anne C. Mulkern. WASHINGTON--
Deep in the storage rooms of Harvard Universitys prestigious Peabody Museum
of Archaeology and Ethnology rests a dark-haired doll in a wooden coffin,
a childs prized possession with a sad and sordid past. The
doll, it turns out, was once part of the burial site of a Klamath Indian
girl, until it was yanked from its grave by an early 20th century tomb
raider, who passed it along toHarvard University. Now, along with Chicagos
Field Museum and some of Americas other most prestigious storehouses of
national lore, Harvard is owning up to its history of grave robbing from
the Native Americans. According
to the paper, a growing cache of federal documents reviewed by The Denver
Post shows the widespread scope of the practice and the complicity of
museums in acquiring Indian items, for both scientific reasons and financial
gain. Its a situation with faint parallels to the centuries-old controversy
about items plundered from ancient Greece and brought to Britainthe most
famous being the Elgin Marblesexcept in this case the items in question
are religious artifacts stolen from gravesites in one part of a country
and brought to museums in another part, all in the name of the ongoing
scientific inquiry of white people into the enduring mystery of non-white
people. Are
you proud to be an American yet? The
Feds passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
in 1990, which requires the museums to be more responsible and to own
up to their past offenses, says the Post. But some of those offensives
are regrettably recent: Harvard
accepted an iron hatchet and iron-carving tool from a Pawnee grave in
1985 from Boston benefactor William H. Claflin. They came from the collection
of his father, William Claflin Sr., who had sponsored excavations of Native
American sites. This should be a bigger story than it is..
|
||||